It is very evident that the game of basketball is evolving. With the advent of the stretch four and the high level of skill work that goes into player development, the game has almost become position-less. The days of playing point guard, shooting guard, small forward, power forward and center are over. You are now a guard, a wing, a post, or a specialist. There are still some true point guards out there, but we are mostly seeing combo guards with the ability to score and take over a game. There are still centers, but the reality is that center does not mean what it did in the 80’s and 90’s with guys like Hakeem Olajuwon, David Robinson, Patrick Ewing, and Shaquille O’Neal dominating the paint with highly efficient back to the basket skill sets. A center now is someone that is long and athletic that works as a rim protector, a rebounder (offensive put-back guy), and a pick and roll player.
So the question becomes, are you growing with the times as a coach or staying in your comfort zone? What are you teaching in your workouts/practices and, more importantly, do you know why you are teaching what you are teaching? In other words, what is driving your process? The follow-up question is, then, how are you teaching it?
What are you teaching and why?
Every summer I am reminded of a very interesting stat from Coach Don Showalter (USA 16U/17U Coach): “In the United States, kids are playing five games for every practice; in Europe, kids are practicing five times for every game.” It is not a coincidence that Europe has more and more draft picks every year and that their national teams are highly competitive. The European player is equipped with a skill set that most American players do not possess. This is not a 100% accurate obviously, however, guys like Kevin Love are the exception to the rule these days.
With all this being said, AAU is not going anywhere. The exposure these players are getting as early as third grade and the money that is driving the industry dictates that the five games for every one practice model in the United States will not be changed and the problem will continue to perpetuate, so, what can we do?
For one, in my humble opinion, youngsters in the third grade should not be playing that many games without developing their skill sets; all that is happening is they are using their undeveloped skills and forming bad habits. With our program (although we are not a traditional school because we are selective enrollment which means you have to test to get in, so we do not really have a “traditional feeder” system per se), the travel teams we work with begin to play most of their games in the sixth grade. And even with that, we really work to do more skill training and development sessions than games. We believe that AAU should not really begin until high school (even then obviously skill development is paramount, but at least there is a foundation to build off of).
The first thing you can do to combat the five games/one practice model is focus your feeder system to do less games and more training with the lower levels. Do not feed the AAU monster. Allow your players to develop. Don’t get me wrong, certainly playing and developing a healthy love for competition is important, but building and then breaking bad habits should not be the cost of healthy competition.
At the lower levels, pretty much any youngster up to sixth grade should be taught the foundation of the game: shooting, passing/catching, ball handling, and triple threat work. So often we see a kid in third grade that is the tallest in his or her class and he or she gets thrown on the block and is told to rebound and post up. The only development he or she gets is the Mikan drill. Then, by eighth grade, he or she is no longer the tallest player and the love of the game is gone because he or she can no longer compete with everyone else as they have evolved their skill sets.
I do not believe in position specific workouts until high school, and even then you should be cautious. Think about it, it is so much more beneficial for everyone involved to develop the foundations of the game and to teach players to play seamlessly; by the time you have them operating in a system in high school you will have a team of highly skilled individuals that are now hungry to develop their position-specific skill sets. Again, don’t get me wrong, you can still put players on the blocks at a younger age, but it should not be a specific player every time. I love the Read and React offense, especially for the lower levels. You can go five out, four out with a post, or three out with two posts, but the beauty is that the posts can be your “guards”. Let all players develop their back to the basket game as. In the end, it is only going to make them better. By the time the players reach high school and their bodies start filling out and puberty sets in, there is still ample time to develop a true post game and an offensive system that fits your personnel. At the end of the day, a system does not work if the players cannot operate in that system, so again, the key is having skilled players.
How are you teaching?
The old adage “repetition is the mother of learning” drives what we do for player development. There are a lot of big time trainers out there now, but in my opinion some of them are too gimmicky. The best trainers, guys like Drew Hanlen of Pure Sweat, are training the correct habits in game-like situations. Dribbling five basketballs while juggling ten tennis balls is not training in-game habits. The key is to identify the skill sets that you as a coach want your players to develop (by age level) and to have a progression of drills that will enable those habits to develop. We want to do ball handling for all age levels, but a third grader should not be working on a crossover, spin move combo before mastering right and left hand pound dribbles. Again, if the individual is advanced and ready for the challenge, you introduce new concepts, but again, there should be a curriculum in place with goals for each level.
From there, it is not giving 100 drills for one skill. You definitely want to keep the youngsters engaged, challenged and excited to work out, but again, “repetition is the mother of learning”. Having a few different drills per skill set is sufficient.
Now, with those different drills, the key in keeping the youngster engaged, challenged, and excited is making those drills competitive. Do everything with a time and score. Even if the drill does not allow for interpersonal competition (against peers), there can be intrapersonal competition (competing against yourself and your previous time and score).
Finally, it is about empowering your player to use his imagination. Mental training is just as, if not more important than the physical training. Put yourself in late game situations in your workouts and you will be prepared when the game creates that situation. As Coach Kevin Eastman always says: “be there before you get there.”
I love listening to Northwestern’s Head Coach Chris Collins put a player through a workout. He is constantly stressing the importance of “using your imagination”. Every time you rep a shooting drill, put yourself in a late game situation. Make the shots you are taking affect the score you have created in your mind. As a coach, you can use your imagination as well in creating these drills and making them competitive and engaging. Using your imagination trains the mental aspect of the game. Putting pressure on the shots being taken or the skill being developed only enhances the youngsters ability to operate in game situations.
The irony is, a lot of people feel that making youngsters competitive in these drills will deter them and ultimately hurt their confidence, however, the exact opposite is true as long as the goals of the drill are realistic. At the end of the day, in some drills you will make your time and score and in some drills you will not. When you make your time you are boosting confidence and initiating upward thinking as you are now ready to set a new goal. If you miss your goal you now have intrinsic motivation for going after that drill again. The key is to have positive coaches teaching youngsters how to train the right way and how to set goals with progression in place.
We need to be aware of what we are teaching, why we are teaching what we teach, and how we are teaching our players. The game is evolving and we need to grow with the times by being life-long learners and evolving ourselves.
What are your thoughts? Please share in the comments section below.
Thanks for sharing. This year I implemented a systems where the drills were competitive even the most basic ones.
Greater player development and reaction.
So true wrt parental and player demand for playing games more tan practices. Have preached to parents and players why we focus on practicing at least 4x more than we play games. Kids develop cherry-raisin-apple-pie habits in wreck and school programs since less time is spent on fundamentals at home or at those types of “organized” practices. I tell my parents and players often enough forget the games – until Jenney/Jimmie and their team can meet certain performance measures of basic skills they arent ready for competition. Basics like making proper left and right handed layups, left and right hand dribble about equally well, two ball dribbling with no loss of ball for 2 minutes while zig-zagging, able to do 5 ladders(suicides) under 35 seconds and not be spent, able to do 10x their grade in push ups and situps properly,, then the team performance measure drills like 60+ layup makes by team full court in 2 minutes, 3 person weave with no missed or dropped passes and no missed layups with excellent transition and no ball hitting the floor except bounce pass to layup – just a few individual and team level performance measures we try to sue.. but often the parental and player desires/demands to play force one to enter games you know the team isnt ready for but the good of that is getting pasted by a higher level team so they see and understand why you tell them they are not ready for prime time..8-)
VERY WELL SPOKEN!!!! This needs to be read on national TV. Repetition is the mother of all learning and I saw that @ Peoria Manual High School in the 90’s when I was a junior high feeder coach. I had to fight for practice time @ my school and caught flack for emphasizing fundamentals over X’s and O’s. I also caught flack over insisting on discipline on and off the court. But I was rewarded for my efforts by the praise I got from the coaches who later worked w/ my kids. They the kids from my program would be disciplined and coachable. They would come to practice, on time, listen, and do what was asked of them to the best of their ability. They knew my kids would know the fundamentals, especially the two most important ones: if you want something you have to earn it and NEVER EVER GIVE UP (hats off, again, to Coach Valvano). I was rewarded with a chance to help coach at Manual. I got to see 9 of my former players get state championship medals around their necks (that was better than any tournament trophy). Best of all, I got to see scores of young men grow up to be good people.
The best programs are built on solid teaching. Yes, at the highest levels recruiting plays a big role but to be consistently successful you have to be a teacher. Lou Henson 9600 plus wins @ D I and a great mentor to many young men told me that at the high school and youth level great teaching is what makes a coach successful. Morgan Wooten had talent, but he also taught it. Wayne McClain and Dick Van Syoc at Peoria Manual had great talent, but they also taught it. John Wooden was the consummate teacher. He never worried about scouting but instead worried about teaching his players to play to their best. “Let others rise to the occasion,” he would say, “We will be there to begin with.”
The best programs from the youth level all the way up to the NBA know and exemplify this. How many times have we seen kids with great natural ability never fulfill their promise? It’s because they didn’t learn to use that ability while others with lesser gifts passed them up. I have had the chance to talk to some NBA players and coaches. I would always ask them “who is the greatest player in the world, the most gifted?” I always expected to hear Jordan, Drexler, the BIG O, Kareem, Wilt, Jerry West, or Larry Bird. But that was not the answer. Invariably it was “some guy in prison” or something to that effect. You could go to most prisons and find enough natural ability to field pro teams in several sports. The problem is that those guys never learned how to use their ability.
Current theory on what it takes to be successful, the psychology of success, centers on the ability to work hard, overcome adversity, and to drill the fundamentals that allow a person to succeed in any field. The 10,000 hour theory states that it takes 10,000 hours of deliberate practice to become world class at any endeavor and that those people whom we deem as prodigies were merely people who got in their 10,000 hours early. The 10,000 hour figure is really just a general figure to illustrate that to be good you have to practice, rally practice, engage in deliberate practice, to master a skill. Repetition really is the mother of learning
Coaching isn’t about getting kids “exposure, winning trophies, or turning out D I prospects. It’s about impacting the lives of young people, helping them grow up, and teaching them the characteristics of success. It isn’t getting them to the “right” camps or tournaments. It isn’t allowing them to exhibit their athleticism. It isn’t recruiting an all star team. Until we start realizing this again, we better get used to pronouncing names like SGasol, Kucoc, Nowiski, Bogdanovic, Varejao, or Turkoglu when we watch the NBA, because they realize this in other countries. We better get back to what works if we want our country to maintain its significance in sport and in the world.
Repetition and competition.
I agree and disagree I agree about the game evolving but I also know that this game is in cycles. It will come back to the back to the basket post just that it will be a more athletic post that can face the basket and play away from the basket. I agree with the AAU scene and most of these kids won’t even play at the next level. That why they are creating other leagues for the ones that are higher skilled at this age